On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 10:38:16PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 05:15:20PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > To quote a part from that email: > > > You were right. If I change: > > > no-idea no-rc5 shared
> > > to: > > > zlib no-idea no-rc5 shared > > > and rebuild, cyrus-imapd gives me that "bad record mac" error with the > > > resulting openssl. Removing "zlib" makes it go away. > > So it seem we have 2 things that conflict here. If we have zlib, > > it breaks applications, if we don't, it breaks others. > I should correct myself. We have 3 options for zlib: > - no-zlib > - zlib > - zlib-dynamic > Package breaks if we use zlib-dynamic and zlib1-dev is not > installed, which is why we used zlib instead. Fix zlib-dynamic to use /usr/lib/libz.so.1 properly instead of /usr/lib/libz.so? > Build with any of those options it fails with the "decryption failed or > bad record mac" error. "any of those options" means all of no-zlib, zlib, and zlib-dynamic? > If either the server or the client do not support zlib, things > work. > And it seems that the 0.9.7 server doesn't use zlib, even though > it was build with zlib support. > I'm still not sure if this is a bug in the server or the client. So what breaks if using no-zlib? You said "it breaks other [applications]; which ones and how? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
