On 25/09/15 00:10, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > <po...@debian.org> wrote: >> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 21:58:46 +0200 <g...@debian.org> wrote: >>> You make me wonder. Would it worth to have packages with different >>> quantum depth support in parallel? I mean I would compile / install >>> the package twice; first for QD=16 and then QD=32 to different paths >>> so I can ship the libraries parallel for any given release. >> >> Please fix the aforementioned bug as it's blocking the GCC5 transition, and >> worry about compiling things twice and providing multiple libraries later. > It was just a question for future upstream releases. Life is easier - > my slowness is due to IRL things, just got back home recently and need > to get up early in the morning. But working on the fix / update and > going to upload it soon.
Yeah, sorry if that came out too harsh. I just meant to say that fixing the RC bug should take priority as this is blocking other transitions. It's good that you're looking at it, so no worries. Thanks, Emilio
