Le 17/09/2015 22:45, Rebecca N. Palmer a écrit :
> Package: src:pocl
> Version: 0.10-10
> Severity: serious
> Control: found -1 0.10-12
> Control: block 794935 with -1
>
> The binNMU of pocl for the llvm-toolchain-3.5 transition
> (https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=pocl&arch=amd64&ver=0.10-10%2Bb1&stamp=1442439767)
> failed with symbols mismatches, at least some of which look gcc-5 related
> (though I haven't checked whether they all are, and pocl does have a history
> of symbols issues), e.g.
>
> -
> (optional=templinst)_ZN4llvm12hash_combineINS_9hash_codeESsEES1_RKT_RKT0_@Base
> 0.10
> [...]
> +#MISSING: 0.10-10+b1#
> (optional=templinst)_ZN4llvm12hash_combineINS_9hash_codeENS_9StringRefEEES1_RKT_RKT0_@Base
> 0.10
> +
> _ZN4llvm12hash_combineINS_9hash_codeENSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEEEES1_RKT_RKT0_@Base
> 0.10-10+b1
>
> Also, nearly all the tests failed: the build treats this as non-fatal, but it
> should probably be investigated.
>
> A local build of 0.10-12 from experimental had far fewer (but not no) test
> failures, but still FTBFS with the symbols issue.
pocl 0.10 is outdated. There is no interest into digging into it.
I started to package the new version but did not have time to finish
for now. Help welcome (I just pushed my initial work in collab-maint)
pocl 0.10 can be removed from testing for now if this help transitions.
And, for information, I plan to remove symbols tracking. This is a mess
due to C++ mangling and all C++ libraries are only used internally.
So, there is no interest at all into tracking the symbol list.
Regards,
Vincent
--
Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0xD17897FA vdanj...@debian.org
GPG key fingerprint: 621E 3509 654D D77C 43F5 CA4A F6AE F2AF D178 97FA
Unofficial pkgs: http://moais.imag.fr/membres/vincent.danjean/deb.html
APT repo: deb http://people.debian.org/~vdanjean/debian unstable main
