On 2015-09-17 22:25, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:39:17PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Source: aegisub
>> Version: 3.2.2+dfsg-2
>> Severity: serious
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have noticed that aegisub is unfortunately not binNMU safe, when we
>> tried to rebuild it as a part of the GCC-5 transition. The issue is
>> caused by:
>>
>> """
>> override_dh_installdocs:
>> dh_installdocs --link-doc=aegisub
>> """
>>
>> This statement makes aegisub-l10n depend strictly on
>> aegisub (= ${binary:Version}), which is required to ensure the correct
>> copyright file is always present.
>
> Current Depends line for aegisub-l10n is like this:
>
> Depends: ${misc:Depends},
> aegisub (>= ${source:Version}),
> aegisub (<< ${source:Version}.1~)
>
> Is this not binNMU-safe? How it's not?
> The resulting package has: Depends: aegisub (= 3.2.2+dfsg-2) Which is not binNMU safe. As stated(/implied by the?) above, it is added by dh_installdocs --link-docs. Thanks, ~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
