Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:37:10 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:40:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:40:35 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62]
helo=chistera.yi.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Evlzk-0001JO-6U
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:48 -0800
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60)
id 1Evlzh-00070G-0E
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:45 +0100
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: wmtemp: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:45 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: wmtemp
Version: 0.0.5-2
Severity: serious
Hello,
This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from
source.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html
To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and
substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development
libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed
information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2].
[2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev
As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86
to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not
be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from
testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner.
[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg00004.html
The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge,
so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to
follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of
affected packages can be found here [4].
[4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev
Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
their upload.
Thanks for your collaboration!
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 346882-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2006 12:41:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 15 04:41:22 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailer.1blu.de
([213.83.63.60] helo=ms4-2.1blu.de ident=mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ey7CD-0006xV-RU
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 04:41:22 -0800
Received: from [85.180.53.60] (helo=sigma.lsweb.de)
by ms4-2.1blu.de with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #1)
id 1Ey7C9-000346-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 13:41:17 +0100
Received: from steinke by sigma.lsweb.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Ey7C8-0002P0-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 13:41:16 +0100
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 13:41:16 +0100
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:37:10 +0100
From: Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Url: http://www.lsweb.de
Version: 0.0.5-4
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Fixed Build-Depends for xlibs-dev transition using=20
xlibs-split-check and objdump.
Regards,
--=20
/(__ __|\ Lars Steinke - Debian Developer,
( \/ __)_ check out http://www.debian.org.
) (_____ / For my PGP public key & Web page=20
/___________/ use the URL http://www.lsweb.de.
--bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDyP6GzOw49aNnnBYRAhg6AKCGJPmeXEOupjiNZ8R2DgALj5eY4wCeJHap
LpG6khTmUsDUnxnystmjlkg=
=yxrK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
