On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 12:05:27PM +0100, Martin Lohmeier wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 11:17:22AM +0100, Martin Lohmeier wrote:
> >>Package: gksu > >>Version: 1.3.6-1 > >>Severity: grave > >>Justification: renders package unusable > >>gksu depend on gconf2 which has been replaced by gconf2-common. > > How is this grave? There is still a gconf2 binary package in unstable, with > > the same version number as gconf2-common. I don't believe the package in > > question has been replaced. > For some reasons the package is not installable here: > client:/home/blackm# apt-get install gconf2 > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree... Done > Package gconf2 is not available, but is referred to by another package. > This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or > is only available from another source > However the following packages replace it: > libgconf2-dev gconf2-common > E: Package gconf2 has no installation candidate Very strange. What does 'apt-cache policy gconf2' show? Does apt-get update change anything? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
