On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 09:09:25AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > Source: gromacs > Version: 5.0.6-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: breaks ABI without a package rename > Tags: sid stretch > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: libstdc++-cxx11 > > Background[1]: libstdc++6 introduces a new ABI to conform to the > C++11 standard, but keeps the old ABI to not break existing binaries. > Packages which are built with g++-5 from experimental (not the one > from testing/unstable) are using the new ABI. Libraries built from > this source package export some of the new __cxx11 or B5cxx11 symbols, > dropping other symbols. If these symbols are part of the API of > the library, then this rebuild with g++-5 will trigger a transition > for the library. > > In the case of gromacs, std::string appears in installed headers, > so it seems very likely that a transition is needed.
Isn't this just #791061 again? To the best of my knowledge, nothing external uses those. -- Nicholas Breen nbr...@debian.org
