Okay, point taken. But now that it is renamed, should I really rename it again?
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 23:25:34 +0200 Julien Cristau <jul...@cristau.org> wrote: > That still doesn't make sense. You shouldn't rename the dev package, but if > you do it shouldn't include a version... > > On August 27, 2015 11:11:52 PM CEST, Riley Baird > <bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch> wrote: > >> libassa3.5-5-dev was renamed to libassa-3.5-5-dev, which makes > >reverse > >> deps unbuildable. Please revert that change, there's no reason to > >> rename the -dev package. > > > >The only reverse dep is granule, which I've prepared a new version of. > >I'm waiting for it to be uploaded. > > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
pgpKcB3fRruQR.pgp
Description: PGP signature