Hello Martin,

I supplied a patch to bugsx fixing the xlibs-dev transition bug.
Unfortunately, I failed to take into account "direct dependencies".
Your package has a direct dependency on x-dev and libx11-dev, which
dependssd on x-dev.  So, your package builds fine, but an additional
build-dependency on "x-dev" should probably be added for the next
upload.

-- 
Clear skies,
Justin

On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:48:13AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:32:06 -0800
> with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> and subject line Bug#346628: fixed in bugsx 1.08-8
> has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
> 
> This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
> If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
> Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
> 
> (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
> talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
> somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)
> 
> Debian bug tracking system administrator
> (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:38:32 +0000
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:38:32 2006
> Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] 
> helo=chistera.yi.org)
>       by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
>       id 1EvlzU-0000lq-6n
>       for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:32 -0800
> Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) 
>         id 1Evlyz-0006jV-CL
>         for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:01 +0100
> From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: bugsx: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:01 +0100
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
>       (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
> X-Spam-Level: 
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
>       autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
> 
> Package: bugsx
> Version: 1.08-7
> Severity: serious
> 
> Hello,
> 
>   This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
>   build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
>   no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from
>   source.
> 
>     [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html
> 
>   To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and
>   substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development
>   libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed
>   information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2].
> 
>     [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev
> 
>   As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86
>   to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not
>   be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from
>   testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner.
> 
>     [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg00004.html
> 
>   The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge,
>   so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to
>   follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of
>   affected packages can be found here [4].
> 
>     [4] 
> http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev
> 
>   Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
>   be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
>   read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
>   their upload.
> 
>   Thanks for your collaboration!
> 
> -- 
> Adeodato Sim??                                     dato at net.com.org.es
> Debian Developer                                  adeodato at debian.org
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------
> Received: (at 346628-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2006 13:40:35 +0000
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 14 05:40:35 2006
> Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
>       id 1ExlVm-0006L9-Cz; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:32:06 -0800
> From: Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
> Subject: Bug#346628: fixed in bugsx 1.08-8
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:32:06 -0800
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
>       (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
> X-Spam-Level: 
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
>       autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
> 
> Source: bugsx
> Source-Version: 1.08-8
> 
> We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
> bugsx, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
> 
> bugsx_1.08-8.diff.gz
>   to pool/main/b/bugsx/bugsx_1.08-8.diff.gz
> bugsx_1.08-8.dsc
>   to pool/main/b/bugsx/bugsx_1.08-8.dsc
> bugsx_1.08-8_i386.deb
>   to pool/main/b/bugsx/bugsx_1.08-8_i386.deb
> 
> 
> 
> A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
> attached.
> 
> Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
> have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
> 
> Debian distribution maintenance software
> pp.
> Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated bugsx package)
> 
> (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
> believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
> administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:08:50 +0100
> Source: bugsx
> Binary: bugsx
> Architecture: source i386
> Version: 1.08-8
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Changed-By: Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Description: 
>  bugsx      - evolve biomorphs using genetic algorithms
> Closes: 346628
> Changes: 
>  bugsx (1.08-8) unstable; urgency=low
>  .
>    * Change build-dependancy on xlibs-dev to libx11-dev, since the former was
>      removed from the archive. (closes: 346628)
> Files: 
>  76489391b39ecc90e229b488fc35ce5a 571 math optional bugsx_1.08-8.dsc
>  d46fa2eedac3f7f797740baa5462a766 2059 math optional bugsx_1.08-8.diff.gz
>  c2fd19c0df8faad92bdeca8a647ea953 331256 math optional bugsx_1.08-8_i386.deb

Reply via email to