Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:52:44 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2005 06:56:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 22:56:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EbukH-00075I-Dm
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:56:45 -0800
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
        by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA25476
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:43 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59138F212
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:43 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 29960-24 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:42 +0100 (MET) 13920
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
        by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:42 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jAF6ugS4009109
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:42 +0100 (MET)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:42 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: mecab
Severity: important

Please do not take any action before reading
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00010.html

This bug report is filed against the source package which builds
a library depending on libstdc++6 and defining or referencing
*mt_alloc* symbols.  The package has to be rebuilt with either
g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 or g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 (or newer).  Please rename the
library package to a name with a "c2a" suffix, and adjust the build
dependencies if dependencies on another renamed library do exist.

Do *not* yet upload the package, but wait for a followup mail to this
bug report.

If this bug report is for some reason invalid, please close it with
a short reasoning.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 339230-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2006 14:52:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 14 06:52:49 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vaj.namazu.org ([61.215.208.42])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1Exmlt-0006lg-5d
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:52:49 -0800
Received: from vaj.namazu.org (vaj.namazu.org [61.215.208.42])
        by vaj.namazu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB81E200BC
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:52:45 +0900 (JST)
From: TSUCHIYA Masatoshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-cite: xcite 1.57
X-Cite-Me: =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCRVobKEI=?=
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:52:44 +0900
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Aurelien Jarno's
        message of "Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:12:17 +0100")
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

I believe that this bug is fixed by Aurelien's patch.  Thanks Aurelien!

-- 
TSUCHIYA Masatoshi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to