Your message dated Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:46:44 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libproc-process-perl: FTBFS: Test failure
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2005 04:13:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 15 21:13:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pop04.mail.atl.earthlink.net [207.69.200.28] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1Dte3O-0000iR-00; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 21:13:30 -0700
Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] 
helo=frobnitz.homelinux.net)
        by pop04.mail.atl.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #10)
        id 1Dte3N-0007Oi-00
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 00:13:29 -0400
Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.52)
        id 1Dte3C-00068B-6I
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 21:13:20 -0700
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libproc-process-perl: FTBFS: Test failure
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 21:13:09 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libproc-process-perl
Severity: serious
Version: 0.39-1

>From my build log:

...
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=3D1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harn=
ess(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
t/process....Unknown data format type `=FE=83=BF=BF=BF=BE=A0' returned from=
 OS_get_table at t/process.t line 19.
dubious
        Test returned status 13 (wstat 3328, 0xd00)
DIED. FAILED tests 1-3
        Failed 3/3 tests, 0.00% okay
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail  Failed  List of Failed
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
----
t/process.t   13  3328     3    6 200.00%  1-3
Failed 1/1 test scripts, 0.00% okay. 3/3 subtests failed, 0.00% okay.
make[1]: *** [test_dynamic] Error 13
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libproc-process-perl-0.39'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=3Den, LC_CTYPE=3Den (charmap=3DUTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to =
en_US.UTF-8)

--=20
Daniel Schepler              "Please don't disillusion me.  I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]    haven't had breakfast yet."
                                 -- Orson Scott Card

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 318546-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2006 01:59:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 13 17:59:34 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from lafa.iiec.unam.mx ([132.248.72.141])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1Exaha-00070B-Qo
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:59:34 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
        by lafa.iiec.unam.mx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1973000152
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:09:11 -0600 (CST)
Received: from lafa.iiec.unam.mx ([127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (lafa.iiec.unam.mx [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
        with ESMTP id 28990-05 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
        Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:09:11 -0600 (CST)
Received: from gwolf.org (dsl-201-133-69-38.prod-infinitum.com.mx 
[201.133.69.38])
        by lafa.iiec.unam.mx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1247A300014B
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:09:11 -0600 (CST)
Received: by gwolf.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 245BC180238F; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:46:44 -0600 (CST)
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:46:44 -0600
From: Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: libproc-process-perl: FTBFS: Test failure
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at iiec.unam.mx
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

I tried to reproduce this bug - Both inside a Sid live system and in a
i386 chroot, it built correctly.

Please check if this bug is still present, and what your build
environment looks like. Of course, feel free to reopen.

Greetings,

--=20
Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)1451-2244 / 5623-0154
PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973  F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF

--7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDyFgE2A7zWou1J68RAsiVAJ9sakzkQ22OCYGK7ZtkPOXCIog8lgCgsMYe
0U3k4hqpUFTg9xrCtNDKuAw=
=84Ad
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to