Your message dated Thu, 13 Aug 2015 19:04:20 +0100
with message-id <55ccdc24.60...@andrewgee.org>
and subject line 
has caused the Debian Bug report #754425,
regarding gpxviewer: incorrect /etc/mailcap entry for application/xml
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
754425: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754425
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gpxviewer
Version: 0.4.3-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software

The /etc/mailcap file contains the following entry:

application/xml; gpxviewer %s; test=test -n "$DISPLAY"

This is stupid! Most XML files are not GPX files thus cannot be read
by gpxviewer. This breaks software (such as Mutt) using mailcap to be
able to view various kinds of files, here XML files.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.11-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages gpxviewer depends on:
ii  librsvg2-common   2.40.2-1
ii  python            2.7.6-2
ii  python-gnome2     2.28.1+dfsg-1
ii  python-gtk2       2.24.0-3+b1
ii  python-osmgpsmap  0.7.3-3
ii  xdg-utils         1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-7.1

gpxviewer recommends no packages.

gpxviewer suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Corrected to application/gpx+xml in latest upstream version

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to