On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 04:00:28PM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote: > > Hrm, libgalago1's build-deps should *not* be satisfiable; dbus-glib-1-dev > > has been renamed to libdbus-glib-1-dev, which requires a source update.
> However, it works for me: > # apt-get build-dep libgalago1 > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree... Done > The following NEW packages will be installed: > libdbus-glib-1-dev > 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 12 not upgraded. > Need to get 222kB of archives. > After unpacking 446kB of additional disk space will be used. > Do you want to continue [Y/n]? > Get:1 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main libdbus-glib-1-dev 0.60-5 [222kB] > Fetched 222kB in 0s (346kB/s) > Selecting previously deselected package libdbus-glib-1-dev. > (Reading database ... 990027 files and directories currently installed.) > Unpacking libdbus-glib-1-dev (from .../libdbus-glib-1-dev_0.60-5_i386.deb) ... > Setting up libdbus-glib-1-dev (0.60-5) ... Then apparently you're picking up the build-dependencies for the experimental version of libgalago? > > I've queued libevolution-cil for binNMUs, but it's currently failing due to > > screwiness in its build dep tree; see > > <http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=evolution-sharp&arch=i386&ver=0.10.2-2%2Bb2&stamp=1137143997&file=log>. > Should I report a bug then ? Not against evolution-sharp; a bug report against whichever build-dep is broken would be reasonable. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
