On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 10:40:53PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:

> It looks like gbsplay 0.0.92-1 was never uploaded to the archive. Could you
> please merge 0.9.92-2 into the changelog entry for 0.9.92-1?

I got an upload error on my first try (signed with the wrong GPG key)
and I was not able to overwrite my upload with a fixed package, so I
created the -2 version.

I've merged -2 into -1 and here are the files:

http://www.cgarbs.de/tmp/gbsplay_0.0.92-1.diff.gz
http://www.cgarbs.de/tmp/gbsplay_0.0.92-1.dsc
http://www.cgarbs.de/tmp/gbsplay_0.0.92-1_i386.build
http://www.cgarbs.de/tmp/gbsplay_0.0.92-1_i386.changes
http://www.cgarbs.de/tmp/gbsplay_0.0.92-1_i386.deb
http://www.cgarbs.de/tmp/gbsplay_0.0.92-1_source.changes
http://www.cgarbs.de/tmp/gbsplay_0.0.92.orig.tar.gz

> lintian also reports
> 
> W: gbsplay: copyright-refers-to-versionless-license-file 
> usr/share/common-licenses/GPL

That's a problem.
Upstream does not say _which_ GPL version in the README:

| gbsplay - A Gameboy sound player
| 
| (C) 2003-2006,2008 by Tobias Diedrich <ranma+gbsp...@tdiedrich.de>
|                       Christian Garbs <mi...@cgarbs.de>
|                       Maximilian Rehkopf <ota...@gmx.net>
|                       Vegard Nossum <vegar...@ifi.uio.no>
|
| Licensed under GNU GPL.

So I don't know what to do :-/


lintian also reports W: gbsplay hardening-no-relro
but I don't know how to fix that.  I've already temporarily removed
all CFLAGS and LDFLAGS settings from debian/rules so that the build
system can automatically set default values for hardening, but that
did not work.


And regarding X: gbsplay: binary-file-built-without-LFS-support
gbsplay is an 8bit hardware emulator.  If anybody handles large files
with it, he's doing something very wrong :-)
(it's only an experimental lintian warning anyways)


Regards,
Christian
-- 
....Christian.Garbs.....................................http://www.cgarbs.de

> Code, der zum Verständnis Dokumentation braucht, ist meistens Käse.
Na ja, sowas kann man wenigstens noch essen. In Verbindung mit
Spaghetti-Code ist das doch was Feines.
Wirklich unschön wäre Maschinenkot.           [Wilfried Krueger in dcsn]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to