Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:51:18 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ubit has been removed from the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:40:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:40:48 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] 
helo=chistera.yi.org)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1Evlzf-0000sj-6p
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:45 -0800
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) 
          id 1Evlz9-0006wt-Bw
          for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:11 +0100
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ubit: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:11 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: ubit
Version: 3.6.4-4
Severity: serious

Hello,

  This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
  build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
  no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from
  source.

    [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html

  To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and
  substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development
  libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed
  information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2].

    [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev

  As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86
  to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not
  be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from
  testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner.

    [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg00004.html

  The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge,
  so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to
  follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of
  affected packages can be found here [4].

    [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev

  Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
  be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
  read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
  their upload.

  Thanks for your collaboration!

-- 
Adeodato Simó                                     dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer                                  adeodato at debian.org


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 346921-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2006 02:51:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 12 18:51:20 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp1.stanford.edu ([171.67.16.123])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1ExF28-0002wL-Ko; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:51:20 -0800
Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.64.19.147])
        by smtp1.Stanford.EDU (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0D2pI74032007;
        Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:51:19 -0800
Received: by windlord.stanford.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 3150EE7909; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:51:18 -0800 (PST)
From: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ubit has been removed from the archive
Organization: The Eyrie
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:51:18 -0800
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) XEmacs/21.4.17 (linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Closing all bugs against ubit because it has been removed from the
archive.

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to