Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:17:15 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329454: fixed in boo 0.7.5.2013-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 21:57:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 14:57:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.196]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EICaO-0003Ur-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:57:04 -0700
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i1so231960nzh
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:56:33 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
b=gWbelLQp6pPZs7PG3Rwp5fbNu/2MLjHDEdhEaGdhvTM6+sFTYjMN/4lMnyuQyvAwzPUrculP8wAJqrptFaBt+wXx6wTXaJIfCK5aV9CUJ4AOUAUQf5CTk5qruHG905qDB9hgAEUMa8ALM2a/rG9gJAfe5yoMDmVOfWqsD6HMkG4=
Received: by 10.54.50.77 with SMTP id x77mr2752402wrx;
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:56:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.142.6 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:56:33 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 23:56:33 +0200
From: H B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: H B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: broken symlinks "/usr/bin/boo*"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: boo
Version: 0.6.0.1858-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After installing boo with "apt-get -t unstable install boo" the expected
executables "booi" and "booc" in "/usr/bin" are just broken symlinks
to "cli-wrapper"
which seems to be a file in package mono-common. mono-common isn't
listed as a dependency of boo. Installing "mono-common"
didn't seem to render the package useful. "booi
<somefilefrom"/usr/share/doc/examples">.boo" didn't do anything.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable'), (100, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=3Den_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8)
(ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)
Versions of packages boo depends on:
ii mono-classlib-1.0 1.1.8.3-1 Mono class library (1.0)
boo recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 329454-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2006 22:24:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 12 14:24:39 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1ExAkt-0003Uk-SQ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:17:15 -0800
From: Sam Clegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#329454: fixed in boo 0.7.5.2013-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:17:15 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: boo
Source-Version: 0.7.5.2013-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
boo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
boo_0.7.5.2013-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/b/boo/boo_0.7.5.2013-1.diff.gz
boo_0.7.5.2013-1.dsc
to pool/main/b/boo/boo_0.7.5.2013-1.dsc
boo_0.7.5.2013-1_all.deb
to pool/main/b/boo/boo_0.7.5.2013-1_all.deb
boo_0.7.5.2013.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/boo/boo_0.7.5.2013.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sam Clegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated boo package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:20:56 +0000
Source: boo
Binary: boo
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.7.5.2013-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sam Clegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Sam Clegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
boo - a python-like language and compiler for the CLI
Closes: 329454 331086
Changes:
boo (0.7.5.2013-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release
* Acknowledge NMU (Closes: #331086, #329454)
Files:
d0470a86efa3602c3a9ca524898af19e 696 devel optional boo_0.7.5.2013-1.dsc
23300db116f34cc29963c2bc6c5f361b 1218233 devel optional
boo_0.7.5.2013.orig.tar.gz
ab2eae76de3fb0ca6728c9ca839ec67d 4217 devel optional boo_0.7.5.2013-1.diff.gz
f97ea624b74619297356974081e1bcea 909574 devel optional boo_0.7.5.2013-1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDxrskLOvxONke42kRAv4OAKDBjLF66/OOER95k6b9F7t5mM8syACcCsSZ
hlNZMI8i3zDr/+jVN9kHfYk=
=uBCZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
