Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:22:42 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Cloning my bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jan 2006 08:08:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 07 00:08:04 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86]
helo=tennyson.dodds.net)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ev97M-0003db-2A
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 00:08:04 -0800
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 156FD7002; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 00:08:03 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 00:08:03 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: netatalk_2.0.3-3 (mips*/unstable): FTBFS: checking for
gss_acquire_cred... no
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6Nae48J/T25AfBN4"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--6Nae48J/T25AfBN4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: netatalk
Version: 2.0.3-3
Severity: serious
The netatalk package is failing to build on mips and mipsel with the current
heimdal packages. This may be a heimdal bug.
[...]
checking for gssapi.h... yes
checking gssapi/gssapi_generic.h usability... no
checking gssapi/gssapi_generic.h presence... no
checking for gssapi/gssapi_generic.h... no
checking gssapi/gssapi.h usability... no
checking gssapi/gssapi.h presence... no
checking for gssapi/gssapi.h... no
checking gssapi/gssapi_krb5.h usability... no
checking gssapi/gssapi_krb5.h presence... no
checking for gssapi/gssapi_krb5.h... no
checking for gss_display_status in -lgssapi... no
checking for gss_display_status in -lgssapi_krb5... no
checking for gss_acquire_cred... no
configure: error: GSSAPI: required function gss_acquire_cred missing
make: *** [config.status] Error 1
[...]
Full build log can be found at
<http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=3Dnetatalk&arch=3Dmips&ver=3D2.0.3-=
3&stamp=3D1135888398&file=3Dlog>.
--=20
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--6Nae48J/T25AfBN4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDv3biKN6ufymYLloRAm4/AKDNZJ2UY9LhqR9zaePhRoD3FJuciwCeIY9E
mOwlTQIj2A9ERLvkQUNpPy4=
=k5Hh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--6Nae48J/T25AfBN4--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 347761-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2006 14:22:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 12 06:22:49 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86]
helo=tennyson.dodds.net)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ex3Lf-0002ZK-Hc
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:22:49 -0800
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 669167005; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:22:42 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:22:42 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Sebastian Rittau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Processed: Cloning my bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/Uq4LBwYP4y1W6pO"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--/Uq4LBwYP4y1W6pO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 06:03:35AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > # Doing what I should have done in the first place ...
> > clone 346346 -1
> Bug#346346: netatalk_2.0.3-3 (mips*/unstable): FTBFS: checking for gss_ac=
quire_cred... no
> Bug 346346 cloned as bug 347761.
> > reassign -1 netatalk 2.0.3-3
> Bug#347761: netatalk_2.0.3-3 (mips*/unstable): FTBFS: checking for gss_ac=
quire_cred... no
> Bug reassigned from package `heimdal-dev' to `netatalk'.
Well, except there's no bug here in netatalk, and netatalk will be rebuilt
automatically on mips/mipsel when the fixed heimdal becomes available... so
closing anyway :)
Thanks,
--=20
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--/Uq4LBwYP4y1W6pO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDxmYyKN6ufymYLloRAub2AKCLDiL4CFVzn36z8Ge5eAeoDymQCQCgrXEv
dv3mobl0kNRZqIc2lUqbivA=
=YWDV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--/Uq4LBwYP4y1W6pO--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
