Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:48:23 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of jed 0.99.16-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:38:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:38:45 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62]
helo=chistera.yi.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Evlzf-0000pT-Os
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:44 -0800
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60)
id 1Evlz3-0006oo-Ez
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:05 +0100
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: jed: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:05 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: jed
Version: 0.99.16-5.1
Severity: serious
Hello,
This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from
source.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html
To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and
substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development
libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed
information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2].
[2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev
As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86
to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not
be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from
testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner.
[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg00004.html
The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge,
so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to
follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of
affected packages can be found here [4].
[4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev
Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
their upload.
Thanks for your collaboration!
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 346733-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2006 13:48:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 12 05:48:27 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kom.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de ([192.129.1.23])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ex2oU-0002c4-Td
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:48:27 -0800
Received: from amalie.intra.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de ([10.1.1.2])
by kom.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ex2oS-0005GW-8Z
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:48:24 +0100
Received: from [10.80.1.253] (helo=laboiss2)
by amalie.intra.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
id 1Ex2oS-0002Tv-00; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:48:24 +0100
Received: from rafael by laboiss2 with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Ex2oR-0005o1-00; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:48:23 +0100
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:48:23 +0100
From: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fixed in NMU of jed 0.99.16-6
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Actually, it was not an NMU. I just forgot to put my name in the Uploaders
field of debian.control. I am closing this bug report.
Rafael
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-01-12 05:32]:
> tag 346733 + fixed
>
> quit
>
> This message was generated automatically in response to a
> non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:47:14 +0100
> Source: jed
> Binary: jed-sl jed jed-common xjed
> Architecture: source all i386
> Version: 0.99.16-6
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: Debian JED Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Changed-By: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Description:
> jed - editor for programmers (textmode version)
> jed-common - byte compiled S-Lang runtime files for jed and xjed
> jed-sl - sources of S-Lang runtime files for jed and xjed
> xjed - editor for programmers (x11 version)
> Closes: 346733
> Changes:
> jed (0.99.16-6) unstable; urgency=low
> .
> * Acknowledge NMU
> * debian/control:
> - Build-depends on libxt-dev instead of xlibs-dev (closes: #346733)
> - Upgraded Standards-Version to 3.6.2 (no changes needed)
> Files:
> a6601eef889f9292db517f2e713adf9e 776 editors optional jed_0.99.16-6.dsc
> 46598f02def85c9b1ba83aca920ad516 84893 editors optional jed_0.99.16-6.diff.gz
> dd6166ce14a5aa71c15294ab623a4fd0 108722 editors optional
> jed_0.99.16-6_i386.deb
> c681544d226f361a9b9536b6f5bdc48a 113512 editors optional
> xjed_0.99.16-6_i386.deb
> 1c5c19d89e00ab225893a7e98b068920 554814 editors optional
> jed-common_0.99.16-6_all.deb
> 52f047959e1a3533f971c4902982d6b5 230438 editors optional
> jed-sl_0.99.16-6_all.deb
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFDxkajk3oga0pdcv4RAmwLAKCWRGMxk5ZkcnurjrWQrgkKOTsWLwCdH/nl
> PVrTpHNDpupVMf0FDCk+AAE=
> =47gG
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-jed-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-jed-devel
>
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
