On 07/08/2015 03:07 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:07:43 Loic Dachary wrote: >> Without integration tests, linking Ceph against the wrong jerasure version >> may lead to data loss. Prior to publishing a Ceph version, various >> integration tests run to verify encoding / decoding, > > Those check are part of post-build tests, right? > > While I was maintaining Ceph I've made changes to run unit tests but James > reverted it as well. :( > > >> this is the main incentive to have jerasure as part of Ceph. > > I'm sure Thomas can enable optimisations in jerasure library.
Unfortunately, no, I can't, because not all amd64 procs have SSE feature, and we need the package to work on every amd64 machines. >> The other reason is that >> jerasure can be optimized for SIMD instructions (ARM / INTEL) and not >> doing so significantly impacts performances. > > Once again, this seems to be an improvement suggestion for libjerasure rather > than argument against using system library. Agreed. Thomas Goirand (zigo) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
