Your message dated Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:43:28 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308812: winbind should depend on samba (smbclient)?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 May 2005 13:42:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 12 06:42:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx2.mail.ru [194.67.23.122]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DWDxD-0004sR-00; Thu, 12 May 2005 06:42:19 -0700
Received: from [128.30.29.44] (port=20173 helo=BELY)
by mx2.mail.ru with asmtp
id 1DWDx7-0003Mo-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 12 May 2005 17:42:17 +0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: winbind should depend on samba (smbclient)?
From: Dmitry Bely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 17:41:08 +0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) XEmacs/21.5 (chayote,
i586-pc-win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: winbind
Version: 3.0.14a-1
Standalone winbind installation without samba is broken:
ntlm_auth: error opening config file /etc/samba/smb.conf. Error was No such
file or directory
I installed smbclient and this have gone away. Looks like the dependency
problem?
- Dmitry Bely
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 308812-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2006 23:43:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 11 15:43:29 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86]
helo=tennyson.dodds.net)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ewpcn-00022m-5R; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:43:29 -0800
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 382127002; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:43:28 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:43:28 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Filip Van Raemdonck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#308812: winbind should depend on samba (smbclient)?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8X7/QrJGcKSMr1RN"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
--8X7/QrJGcKSMr1RN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Version: 3.0.20b-3
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 05:54:24PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Filip Van Raemdonck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > clone 308812 -1 -2
> > retitle -1 winbind - missing dependency on samba-common
> > retitle -2 winbind - missing required directory /var/run/samba
> > severity -1 serious
> > severity -2 serious
> > stop
> 1) I don't really see the rationale in cloning the bug.
> 2) winbind already depends on samba-common, since version 3.0.20b-3
> So, imho, #308812 should be closed (actually I should have closed it
> when we released 3.0.20b-3, this was omitted). And the new bug you
> opened should be as well.
> > There is also a second bug which makes winbind fail even if samba-common
> > =EDs installed: neither winbind nor samba-common create a required
> > /var/run/samba directory.
> That one is correct. However, I don't think it deserves "serious" as
> it makes winbind unusable *only* when samba is not installed which is
> not the most common case.
It is an RC policy violation in the sense that the winbind package is
missing a dependency on a package required for its use. (Removing the need
for such a dependency is a perfectly valid way to fix the bug, of course.)
> So, I hereby propose:
> 1) close #308812 and #347584 with "Version: 3.0.20b-3
Yes, closing 308812 since this dependency has now been added.
> 2) lower #347585 to important
> I don't do it right now because I really want to understand why you
> cloned the bug.
I believe this one should still be left open, and at the present severity.
Cheers,
--=20
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--8X7/QrJGcKSMr1RN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDxZggKN6ufymYLloRArVCAKCyiDJ/zTGRQvnllLW7banpLasRbgCglWoV
ylr1VbJJRpTcu6aPDUJt0tQ=
=RkGM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--8X7/QrJGcKSMr1RN--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
