Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:17:58 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#347386: fixed in guile-gtk-1.2 0.31-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2006 13:35:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 10 05:35:18 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail-in-04.arcor-online.net ([151.189.21.44])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EwJef-00083A-W7
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:35:18 -0800
Received: from mail-in-02-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-02-z2.arcor-online.net 
[151.189.8.14])
        by mail-in-04.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A7F8D4867
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:35:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-in-04.arcor-online.net (mail-in-04.arcor-online.net 
[151.189.21.44])
        by mail-in-02-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 387AB1A9F73
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:35:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from chumley.earth.sol (dslb-082-083-132-107.pools.arcor-ip.net 
[82.83.132.107])
        by mail-in-04.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFBF5D4867
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:35:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: from cts by chumley.earth.sol with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EwJgt-0006Pi-F3
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:37:35 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: guile-gtk: [m68k, ia64]: FTBFS m68k-linux-gcc: command not found
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:37:35 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: guile-gtk
Version: 1.2_0.31-4
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

Hi,
your package fails to build on m68k and ia64, since you specify a (no
longer) existing/used compiler:

Automatic build of guile-gtk-1.2_0.31-4 on tanda by sbuild/m68k 79
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4), libgtk1.2-dev, guile-1.6-dev
** Filtered missing central deps that are dependencies of or provide build-deps:
libglib1.2-dev (>= 1.2.0)
[...]
Checking correctness of source dependencies...
Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.5-10 
linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-2 gcc-4.0_4.0.2-5 g++-4.0_4.0.2-5 
binutils_2.16.1cvs20051214-1 libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.2-5 libstdc++6_4.0.2-5
[...]
make 
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/guile-gtk-1.2-0.31'
cd . && \
  /bin/sh /build/buildd/guile-gtk-1.2-0.31/missing --run automake-1.6 --gnu  
Makefile
/build/buildd/guile-gtk-1.2-0.31/missing: line 46: automake-1.6: command not 
found
WARNING: `automake-1.6' is missing on your system.  You should only need it if
         you modified `Makefile.am', `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'.
         You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages.
         Grab them from any GNU archive site.
cd . && /bin/sh ./config.status Makefile depfiles
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: executing depfiles commands
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/guile-gtk-1.2-0.31'
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/guile-gtk-1.2-0.31'
guile-1.6-snarf -o guile-gtk.x guile-gtk.c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. 
-I/usr/include/gtk-1.2 -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include 
-D_REENTRANT   -g -O2
/usr/bin/guile-1.6-snarf: line 53: m68k-linux-gcc: command not found
make[1]: *** [guile-gtk.x] Error 1

If you have to call the compile by it's exact name, it is m68k-linux-gnu-gcc
since etch, and probably similar for ia64. It should not build on other
arches as well, but maybe they still have an older compiler installed
besides the default gcc-4.0.

Christian

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 347386-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2006 22:24:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 10 14:24:59 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EwRoU-0005Go-Gn; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:17:58 -0800
From: Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#347386: fixed in guile-gtk-1.2 0.31-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:17:58 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: guile-gtk-1.2
Source-Version: 0.31-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
guile-gtk-1.2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

guile-gtk-1.2_0.31-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/guile-gtk-1.2/guile-gtk-1.2_0.31-5.diff.gz
guile-gtk-1.2_0.31-5.dsc
  to pool/main/g/guile-gtk-1.2/guile-gtk-1.2_0.31-5.dsc
libguilegtk-1.2-0_0.31-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/guile-gtk-1.2/libguilegtk-1.2-0_0.31-5_i386.deb
libguilegtk-1.2-dev_0.31-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/guile-gtk-1.2/libguilegtk-1.2-dev_0.31-5_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated guile-gtk-1.2 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:01:52 +1100
Source: guile-gtk-1.2
Binary: libguilegtk-1.2-0 libguilegtk-1.2-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.31-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libguilegtk-1.2-0 - GTK+ 1.2 bindings for the Guile scheme interpreter
 libguilegtk-1.2-dev - GTK+ 1.2 bindings for the Guile scheme interpreter - 
development 
Closes: 347386
Changes: 
 guile-gtk-1.2 (0.31-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Override $CPP during build to workaround old hardcoded
     cpp values in guile-1.6-snarf (bug 317600) (closes: #347386)
   * Move .so link back to runtime package, as previous upload
     re-introduced bugs 232190/232195. Oops.
   * Fix build-time clean-up problem
Files: 
 20be77c6201e971cb552161e0ad91ef0 754 libs optional guile-gtk-1.2_0.31-5.dsc
 1d6464ac6e2f5922ff3fc8561bd9ef62 272256 libs optional 
guile-gtk-1.2_0.31-5.diff.gz
 f5ce27e3e77565f985bcca867d93ca03 190382 libs optional 
libguilegtk-1.2-0_0.31-5_i386.deb
 d2ade9035a03e1ac639d497877064782 228428 libdevel optional 
libguilegtk-1.2-dev_0.31-5_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUBQ8QvMNiYIdPvprnVAQITkAP/ZjLVeM2Dt3WLLBEWHhTaWyT8NhJT/sGT
7+SGtUyr7kAvxBY14BEJNysrKtJD1pXddak5P8SdvDf+xWJ39EHYhfczAKXIjxFL
kV4f2P9ytMSbJA6KOM/ogud7oGDjXSEmmwMegN5vezHVXOR+P7bbeSw/4A5tor37
V1o2FGBBrHk=
=63D6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to