Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:17:17 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346779: fixed in gcvs 1.0final-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:39:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:39:20 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62]
helo=chistera.yi.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Evm0G-0000o2-3v
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:39:20 -0800
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60)
id 1Evlz1-0006m9-HG
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:03 +0100
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gcvs: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:03 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: gcvs
Version: 1.0final-9
Severity: serious
Hello,
This is a serious bug filed against your package because it
build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is
no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from
source.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html
To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and
substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development
libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed
information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2].
[2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev
As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86
to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not
be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from
testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner.
[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg00004.html
The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge,
so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to
follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of
affected packages can be found here [4].
[4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev
Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
their upload.
Thanks for your collaboration!
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 346779-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2006 18:20:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 10 10:20:48 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EwO3Z-0003Dq-Qo; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:17:17 -0800
From: Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#346779: fixed in gcvs 1.0final-10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:17:17 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: gcvs
Source-Version: 1.0final-10
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gcvs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
gcvs_1.0final-10.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gcvs/gcvs_1.0final-10.diff.gz
gcvs_1.0final-10.dsc
to pool/main/g/gcvs/gcvs_1.0final-10.dsc
gcvs_1.0final-10_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcvs/gcvs_1.0final-10_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gcvs package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:47:33 +0100
Source: gcvs
Binary: gcvs
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0final-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
gcvs - Graphical frontend for CVS
Closes: 346779
Changes:
gcvs (1.0final-10) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Removed unnecessary build dependency on xlibs-dev (Closes: #346779)
Files:
ecdb00e91ba0771c9659100ee53912b4 652 devel optional gcvs_1.0final-10.dsc
602f45715b23e52812b926a50e5890f8 10663 devel optional gcvs_1.0final-10.diff.gz
c64c277703cad8ab019cf63f7000759f 711192 devel optional
gcvs_1.0final-10_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDw3UwcaH/YBv43g8RAgQVAJ94SaUemG0ysxYswCe9V/VQDKMyjwCg4xk3
m08DFWUo/HO/pNRSxWlh99M=
=A+ri
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
