On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 08:43:01PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > The other way round? Certainly not, xlibs-dev does not exist anymore. > Is "substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual ..." unproper > English to indicat ethat xlibs-dev is to disappear from Build-Depends?
I parse it as meaning precisely the opposite of what you intend: "Replace the list with xlibs-dev" (basically reading "in place of" for for). The rest of your mail makes it fairly clear what you meant, I just wanted to double check. (An upload will be hitting incoming shortly, BTW.) -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
