Your message dated Thu, 7 May 2015 23:23:17 +0200
with message-id <20150507212317.ga24...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-haskell-maintainers] Bug#773768: jenkins reproduces
this issue
has caused the Debian Bug report #773768,
regarding ghc: fails to install: cannot open shared object file: No such file
or directory
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
773768: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773768
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ghc
Version: 7.8.20141119-8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
ghc fails to install (in clean cowbuilder chroot):
Setting up ghc (7.8.20141119-8) ...
/usr/lib/ghc/bin/ghc: error while loading shared libraries:
libHShaskeline-0.7.1.2-ghc7.8.3.20141119.so: cannot open shared object file: No
such file or directory
/usr/lib/ghc/bin/ghc-pkg: error while loading shared libraries:
libHSterminfo-0.4.0.0-ghc7.8.3.20141119.so: cannot open shared object file: No
such file or directory
dpkg: error processing package ghc (--configure):
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127
Errors were encountered while processing:
ghc
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
- Jonas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=
=BpVX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 06:14:03PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> thanks. I would expect /proc to be present and if not you are on your
> own. Even if that is an unjustified expectation, I think the linker
> should handle it more gracefully.
yeah, a nicer error would be fine, but this is not related to ghc.
> So I’m inclined to close this report. Does anyone disagree?
I agree, closing with this email.
Thanks for your support, and even more thanks to Helmut (and the others who
helped him) to track down the issue.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
