Your message dated Mon, 04 May 2015 13:13:50 +0200
with message-id <5547546e.1020...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#783909: libgphoto2-2-dev missing for requested tests
has caused the Debian Bug report #783909,
regarding libgphoto2-2-dev missing for requested tests
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
783909: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783909
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libgphoto2-2-dev
Version: 2.5.4-1.1+b2
Severity: serious
Hi,
the libgphoto2-2-dev package was deleted too early.
So the upgrade test from puiparts runs always in errors.
[quote]
3m55.6s DEBUG: Starting command: ['chroot', '/tmp/tmpdRsYcr', 'apt-get', '-y',
'install', 'sane-utils', 'libsane-common', 'libsane', 'libsane-dev', 'libsane-
dbg']
3m55.9s DUMP:
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libsane-dev : Depends: libgphoto2-2-dev but it is not going to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
3m55.9s ERROR: Command failed (status=100): ['chroot', '/tmp/tmpdRsYcr', 'apt-
get', '-y', 'install', 'sane-utils', 'libsane-common', 'libsane', 'libsane-
dev', 'libsane-dbg']
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libsane-dev : Depends: libgphoto2-2-dev but it is not going to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
3m56.6s DEBUG: Starting command: ['chroot', '/tmp/tmpdRsYcr', 'umount',
'/proc']
3m56.6s DEBUG: Command ok: ['chroot', '/tmp/tmpdRsYcr', 'umount', '/proc']
3m56.6s DEBUG: Starting command: ['rm', '-rf', '--one-file-system',
'/tmp/tmpdRsYcr']
3m57.0s DEBUG: Command ok: ['rm', '-rf', '--one-file-system', '/tmp/tmpdRsYcr']
3m57.0s DEBUG: Removed directory tree at /tmp/tmpdRsYcr
3m57.0s ERROR: piuparts run ends.
[/quote]
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing-updates'),
(1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/6 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages libgphoto2-2-dev depends on:
ii libgphoto2-dev 2.5.4-1.1+b2
libgphoto2-2-dev recommends no packages.
libgphoto2-2-dev suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 01/05/15 19:22, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> Hi Emilio,
>
> Am Freitag, den 01.05.2015, 17:58 +0200 schrieb Jörg Frings-Fürst:
>> Hi Emilio,
>>
>>
>> Am Freitag, den 01.05.2015, 17:06 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
>>> On 01/05/15 15:20, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
>>>> Hello Emilio,
>>>>
>>>>
>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry but I don't see how that makes it a libgphoto bug.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> libgphoto2-2-dev wasn't in libgphoto2??
>>>
>>> Which isn't a bug, but an intended change.
>>>
>>> You have to update your dependency to the new package name...
>>>
>>
>> Have I once claimed that I had it not done?
>>
>> But piuparts need for testing the last version installable. And there I
>> can change anything.
>>
>
> And it was nice to have a transitional package[1] also in sid/stretch.
The transitional package was there in sid/testing for a whole release cycle. At
some point, transitional packages are removed, and that's happened here after a
release, which is fine.
I'm closing this report as it makes no sense. Just forget about piuparts until
you update your dependency. It will be fine after that.
Emilio
--- End Message ---
