On 2015-03-31 19:50, Niels Thykier wrote:
> [...]
> The list of changes between the Debian version and the Ubuntu version is
> fairly short. I have attached the diff (minus d/changelog) here and we
> are down to:
>
> [...]
>
> Given you suggest that compiling the new upstream also works for you, I
> am suspecting it could be this change:
>
> """
> + * hdparm.c, identify.c, sgio.h: import patch from
> + http://sourceforge.net/p/hdparm/patches/35/ to add support to
> 'hdparm -I'
> + for reporting DevSleep information. LP: #1031173.
> """
>
> [...]
I just checked hdparm-9.45 and it does *not* have that change AFAICT.
Sorry, it was likely a red herring.
Upstream's changelog does mention the following:
"""
hdparm-9.45:
- fixed blocksize handling in fibmap code to use result from
FIGETBSZ in more places (Anton Altaparmakov).
- fixed divide by zero exception in geom.c
- tidying up formatting in sgio.c
hdparm-9.44:
- changed reg_flags struct to more closely match kernel
definition (Lucas Magasweran).
- added fwdownload mode "E" support (Rusty Carruth).
- fix timeouts for security-erase (again!)
- change display of security "supported" to handle ambiguous
reporting from drives
- don't rely upon C-library for byte-swapping
- added --dco-setmax support, courtesy of Geoff Papilion.
"""
(Assuming it rings any bells).
>
> Failing that, Ubuntu also removed the "hdparm-resync.lock". Assuming
> what we exactly see is a deadlock and "timeout" killing hdparm to
> workaround said deadlock. But at this point, I am guessing!
>
>
> Thanks,
> ~Niels
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/intel/+bug/1031173
>
Thanks,
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
