Your message dated Sat, 28 Mar 2015 17:10:19 +0100
with message-id <20150328161019.gb1...@downhill.g.la>
and subject line Re: Bug#781375: libgnutls28-dev: cannot install
has caused the Debian Bug report #781375,
regarding libgnutls28-dev: cannot install
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
781375: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781375
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libgnutls28-dev
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software

Dear Maintainer,

   I tried to install the packages to compile Samba 4.2, this usually 
   means installing libgnutls-dev, but this seems to have been replaced
   by libgnutls28-dev, YOU CANNOT INSTALL THIS!

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libgnutls28-dev : 
Depends: libgnutls-deb0-28 (= 3.3.8-6~bpo70+1) but 3.3.8-6 is to be installed
Depends: libgnutlsxx28 (= 3.3.8-6~bpo70+1) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: nettle-dev (>= 2.5) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libtasn1-6-dev (>= 3.9) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libp11-kit-dev (>= 0.20.7) but it is not going to be installed
libldap2-dev : 
Depends: libldap-2.4-2 (= 2.4.31+really2.4.40-4~bpo70+1) but 2.4.40-4 is to be 
installed

tried to add a few of the above, but:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libgnutls28-dev : Depends: 
libgnutls-deb0-28 (= 3.3.8-6~bpo70+1) but 3.3.8-6 is to be installed
libgnutlsxx28 : Depends: 
libgnutls-deb0-28 (= 3.3.8-6~bpo70+1) but 3.3.8-6 is to be installed
libldap2-dev : Depends: 
libldap-2.4-2 (= 2.4.31+really2.4.40-4~bpo70+1) but 2.4.40-4 is to be installed
libp11-kit-dev : Depends: 
libp11-kit0 (= 0.20.7-1~bpo70+1) but 0.20.7-1 is to be installed
libtasn1-6-dev : Depends: 
libtasn1-6 (= 4.2-2~bpo70+1) but 4.2-2 is to be installed
Recommends: libtasn1-doc (= 4.2-2~bpo70+1) but it is not going to be installed
nettle-dev : Depends: 
libnettle4 (= 2.7.1-1~bpo70+1) but 2.7.1-5 is to be installed
Depends: libhogweed2 (= 2.7.1-1~bpo70+1) but 2.7.1-5 is to be installed

I gave up at this point!!!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
  APT prefers testing-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (100, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2015-03-28 Rowland Penny <rpenny241...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 28/03/15 12:36, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
> >I'm confused as to how your system is in a state containing, and trying
> >to install, packages from wheezy-backports but claiming to only have
> >testing-related sources.list entries.
[...]

> Thanks for pointing out that I had shot myself in the foot :-[

> I ran a script, that somehow added the wheezy backports repo, this must have
> been my fault, I wrote the script :-[ :-[

> Sorry for the noise.

Ok, I am closing the bug-report. Thanks for confirming quickly that it
is a non-bug and thanks to Adam for handling this.

cu Andreas


-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to