> > the libqb0 version 0.17.0-2 compiled on jessie out of the box.
> >
> > so that should be quick and easy. who is going to do it?
>
> In https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768922#35 Jonathan
> Wiltshire (member of the release team) stated that migrating libqb isn't
> an option. And the pacemaker reversion did not happen either. Lacking
> direction, other people couldn't do anything about this either.
Ok. but what i do not understand: as it seems libqb is only used by
pacemaker and its daemons only anyway. so even if it is not as clean as one
would wish for: why cant we still have it? as i said: it compiled fine and
with that library all the pacemaker stuff seems to work well.
i would say it is better to have pacemaker then to not have it in the
distribution...
mond
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
. Franz Schaefer GPG KeyID: CFA2F632
.. +43 699 106 14 590 +43 720502048 Fingerprint: 57C2 C0CC
... schae...@mond.at 6F0A 54C7 0D88 D37E
... http://www.mond.at/ C17C CB16 CFA2 F632
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
