On 09/02/15 15:29, Simon Kelley wrote:
> Of two or three, I'm not sure and I'll take your advice. Two needs no
> code changes and adds no dependencies, and that's good, but if there
> are advantanges to going with three, then I can handle that by making
> the libdbus code conditionally compiled.
(It would be conditional libsystemd code, not conditional libdbus code.)
If I was the maintainer, I'd go for option 2, Type=forking, which makes
the systemd unit work even more like the init script does now -
signalling readiness via the parent process exiting. I'll look into
doing a patch at some point.
S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
