On 2015-01-08 05:17, tony mancill wrote: > [...] > > > Hello Hilko, Emmanuel, > > I'm taking a look at this, but in the interest of the jessie release, I > wanted to ask Emmanuel whether it would be okay to decrease the severity. > > We have a number of other packages with missing or incomplete poms, and > propose that we discuss maven metadata for all Java library packages as > a release goal for jessie + 1. > > Otherwise, the package will be removed soonish (February 5th). > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/lucene4 > > Thanks, > tony > > [...]
Hi, If the bug is RC on its own, but you believe it is irrelevant for the Jessie release, the correct option would be to have it ignored (please file a bug against release.debian.org for that). Mind you, the assumption is that the bug is in fact RC. If not, the release team will probably recommend downgrading it instead. If the bug only prevents "new packages" from being build (i.e. packages not already in Jessie/sid), it /sounds/ like it might not be RC after all (maybe "important"). However, please keep in mind that my answer is solely based on the above mail. Thanks, ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
