On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 11:46:06AM +0100, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > Cameron Norman wrote (16 Nov 2014 03:01:32 GMT) : > > diff --git a/debian/ekeyd.postrm b/debian/ekeyd.postrm > > index 484db5c..4efc368 100644 > > --- a/debian/ekeyd.postrm > > +++ b/debian/ekeyd.postrm > > @@ -1,9 +1,5 @@ > > #!/bin/sh -e > > > > -if test -x /sbin/udevcontrol; then > > - udevcontrol --reload_rules 2>/dev/null || udevcontrol reload_rules > > 2>/dev/null > > -elif test -x /sbin/udevadm; then > > - udevadm control --reload-rules 2>/dev/null || udevadm control > > --reload_rules 2>/dev/null > > -fi > > +invoke-rc.d --quiet udev reload || true > > > > #DEBHELPER# > > IIRC, nowadays udev rules changes are picked up on new udev events > anyway. So, it may be that simply removing ekeyd.postrm would do > the job. > > But anyway, a smaller fix may be better suited for a freeze exception: > simply adding "|| true" at the end of each udevadm or udevcontrol > pipeline should be enough. What do you think?
I'd rather have Cameron's patch. The whole udevadm thing is a bug in itself. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
