Your message dated Sat, 22 Nov 2014 12:08:09 +0100
with message-id <1416654489.6319.1.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line xfslibs-dev: Incorrect licensing information in
debian/copyright
has caused the Debian Bug report #751511,
regarding xfslibs-dev: Incorrect licensing information in debian/copyright
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
751511: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=751511
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: xfslibs-dev
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 4.5
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
It looks like the xfslibs-dev package source files are licensed under LGPL
v2.1, however the debian/copyright file indicates that only the libhandle
package is under LGPL and that the rest of the package is licensed under GPL.
Giridhar
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing-updates
APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.13-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IN, LC_CTYPE=en_IN (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=yzqb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
As analyzed by Christoph already, d/copyright is actually fine:
libhandle -> LGPL 2.1
remaining-> GPL-2
(see doc/COPYING)
Therefore closing.
--
tobi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
