Your message dated Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:19:01 +0100
with message-id <20141119171900.ga2...@client.brlink.eu>
and subject line Re: Bug#769981: reprepro complaining about 'all' architecture
has caused the Debian Bug report #769981,
regarding reprepro complaining about 'all' architecture
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
769981: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=769981
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reprepro
Version: 4.12.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 5.6.8

Dear Maintainer,

I tried to include a package in my existing custom apt repository, and now all
it does is complain about the 'all' architecture, which is apparently a valid
architecture.

https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Architecture

bear:/var/www/apt# reprepro list wheezy
Error: Distribution wheezy contains an architecture called 'all'.
There have been errors!

So now I cannot update my repository. This worked previously, and I do not
understand the nature of the complaint. It is not providing sufficient detail,
and my inquiries on the debian-user list go unanswered. I am not sure how to
proceed.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.6
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-486
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages reprepro depends on:
ii  libarchive12   3.0.4-3+nmu1
ii  libbz2-1.0     1.0.6-4
ii  libc6          2.13-38+deb7u4
ii  libdb5.1       5.1.29-5
ii  libgpg-error0  1.10-3.1
ii  libgpgme11     1.2.0-1.4+deb7u1
ii  zlib1g         1:1.2.7.dfsg-13

Versions of packages reprepro recommends:
ii  apt  0.9.7.9+deb7u5

Versions of packages reprepro suggests:
pn  gnupg-agent      <none>
pn  inoticoming      <none>
pn  lzip             <none>
ii  lzma             9.22-2
ii  xz-utils [lzma]  5.1.1alpha+20120614-2

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
* Michael P. Soulier <msoul...@digitaltorque.ca> [141118 03:57]:
> I tried to include a package in my existing custom apt repository, and now all
> it does is complain about the 'all' architecture, which is apparently a valid
> architecture.
>
> https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Architecture

It is and it is not. "all" means something like "all architectures",
i.e. not limiting a package to one repository.
But you cannot have a Debian installation being architecture "all".

> bear:/var/www/apt# reprepro list wheezy
> Error: Distribution wheezy contains an architecture called 'all'.
> There have been errors!
> 
> So now I cannot update my repository. This worked previously, and I do not
> understand the nature of the complaint. It is not providing sufficient detail,
> and my inquiries on the debian-user list go unanswered. I am not sure how to
> proceed.

- delete "all" from all Architecture: lines in conf/distributions
- run reprepro --delete clearvanished (reprepro should tell you to do
  this if you try to run it)

        Bernhard R. Link
-- 
F8AC 04D5 0B9B 064B 3383  C3DA AFFC 96D1 151D FFDC

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to