Your message dated Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:34:01 +0000 with message-id <e1xpgit-0003cx...@franck.debian.org> and subject line Bug#769359: fixed in ruby-fog-sakuracloud 0.1.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #769359, regarding ruby-fog-sakuracloud,ruby-fog: error when trying to install together to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 769359: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=769359 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: ruby-fog-sakuracloud,ruby-fog Version: 0.1.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Architecture: amd64 Distribution: sid Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has detected the following problem: Selecting previously unselected package ruby-fog. Preparing to unpack .../ruby-fog_1.22.0-2_all.deb ... Unpacking ruby-fog (1.22.0-2) ... dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/ruby-fog_1.22.0-2_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/compute.rb', which is also in package ruby-fog-sakuracloud 0.1.1-1 dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/ruby-fog_1.22.0-2_all.deb This is a serious bug as it makes installation fail, and violates sections 7.6.1 and 10.1 of the policy. An optimal solution would consist in only one of the packages installing that file, and renaming or removing the file in the other package. Depending on the circumstances you might also consider Replace relations or file diversions. If the conflicting situation cannot be resolved then, as a last resort, the two packages have to declare a mutual Conflict. Please take into account that Replaces, Conflicts and diversions should only be used when packages provide different implementations for the same functionality. Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/bin/sakuracloud.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/compute.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/models/compute/plan.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/models/compute/plans.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/models/compute/server.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/models/compute/servers.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/models/compute/ssh_key.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/models/compute/ssh_keys.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/models/compute/zone.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/models/compute/zones.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/models/volume/archive.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/models/volume/archives.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/models/volume/disk.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/models/volume/disks.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/models/volume/plan.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/models/volume/plans.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/requests/compute/boot_server.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/requests/compute/create_server.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/requests/compute/delete_server.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/requests/compute/list_plans.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/requests/compute/list_servers.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/requests/compute/list_ssh_keys.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/requests/compute/list_zones.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/requests/compute/stop_server.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/requests/volume/attach_disk.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/requests/volume/configure_disk.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/requests/volume/create_disk.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/requests/volume/delete_disk.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/requests/volume/list_archives.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/requests/volume/list_disks.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/requests/volume/list_plans.rb usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/fog/sakuracloud/volume.rb This bug is assigned to both packages. If you, the maintainers of the two packages in question, have agreed on which of the packages will resolve the problem please reassign the bug to that package. You may also register in the BTS that the other package is affected by the bug. Cheers, Andreas PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors of this kind see http://edos.debian.net/file-overwrites/.
ruby-fog-sakuracloud=0.1.1-1_ruby-fog=1.22.0-2.log.gz
Description: application/gzip
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Source: ruby-fog-sakuracloud Source-Version: 0.1.1-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ruby-fog-sakuracloud, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 769...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Sebastien Badia <s...@sebian.fr> (supplier of updated ruby-fog-sakuracloud package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 17:21:32 +0100 Source: ruby-fog-sakuracloud Binary: ruby-fog-sakuracloud Architecture: source all Version: 0.1.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers <pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Sebastien Badia <s...@sebian.fr> Description: ruby-fog-sakuracloud - Module for the 'fog' gem to support Sakura no Cloud Closes: 769359 Changes: ruby-fog-sakuracloud (0.1.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium . * Team upload. * Prevent installing ruby-fog-sakuracloud and ruby-fog together (Closes: 769359) Checksums-Sha1: bb99b5f8ef49bfb895af108c376456ef0a37927f 1777 ruby-fog-sakuracloud_0.1.1-3.dsc c784e1d8354c91e846bb618a289b2cc6a1e6c2da 2192 ruby-fog-sakuracloud_0.1.1-3.debian.tar.xz 8970c501e80a7e99ced9909199bb7f5f9f1a1095 11364 ruby-fog-sakuracloud_0.1.1-3_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: d7f203897a6f62705b113e341472a894f61f3ab843da7bcc953f304f3a8bb911 1777 ruby-fog-sakuracloud_0.1.1-3.dsc 0bee359311678401e532f43500e74ee75837238a183a1ff3322bfe11dd2da212 2192 ruby-fog-sakuracloud_0.1.1-3.debian.tar.xz 807e0d0e0b86f0b5696a613a9cfb3ec7fa0707c997736d843e93190498352c45 11364 ruby-fog-sakuracloud_0.1.1-3_all.deb Files: 8374ec666d70f22e021f8194b88972d6 1777 ruby optional ruby-fog-sakuracloud_0.1.1-3.dsc 97b9ab878c12da7aa7d3000a7c649c39 2192 ruby optional ruby-fog-sakuracloud_0.1.1-3.debian.tar.xz a74dbda55aaa81f08337dd888c7ca373 11364 ruby optional ruby-fog-sakuracloud_0.1.1-3_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUZ37pAAoJEImvgrc5zSF6YdsIAJuOvL58pGGn5UmPKyL8YoZN YTBiOO1JOzV+aCqrDy5isrGS97VhXQROccueMK9Z3JefK50aaTMzV3vFU7pfXQu0 R43eSc9OSq3kPRaN/+BLod9cEBfGJ+8Rtzh+iDuLyR7teOO3BSWZ81BsHCUFf0PB WDDB1ORpvVa7/NAoSJrEvewhHtyHL6vwxTbVNEIe4atuLZziHhvujdpMdS4XouSx qko6n3idgczy1tpoPwvG80TL38ClxLlmmykkRJk+TC64kEGzvuc8tprv5J6zrQ68 GF0Z/ZMuJVKCXyIqrPg8nSODEnqC0rcwHo5vFPi/8BTR8vk/AiQ72YuxLEAGXZs= =+pmg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
