On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 05:51:45PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 02:09:50PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > On 2014-11-11 13:55, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > The Breaks: relationships were there originally, but removing them was > > > how I achieved a successfull upgrade from wheezy in the first place, > > > after some hours of trial and error. aptitude would figure the upgrade > > > out just fine, but apt-get wouldn't. > > > > Maybe we need to add some more Breaks elsewhere to push apt into the > > right direction ... > > > > > Looking back, what I didn't do was upgrading apt first, then upgrading > > > the rest of the system. Maybe that would help. > > > > upgrades must work out successfully with the apt-get from wheezy. > > Even if you Breaks: apt (<< jessie), apt will be upgraded first, but the > > apt process running the dist-upgrade is still the old one from wheezy
Noted; but just as an extra data point, if I upgrade dpkg and apt first, then the apt-get from jessie is able to figure out the upgrade. -- Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
