On 2014-11-02 05:39, tony mancill wrote: > I'm just curious about what piuparts is doing here. The only way I can > get the upgrade to fail is if I install firehol-doc_2.0.0+ds-1 *before* > upgrading firehol to 2.0.0+ds-1. But there's not even a firehol-doc > package in jessie, so either the package manager or the user would have > to insist on installing the new firehol-doc package before upgrading > firehol. It seems like the upgrade would handle getting the new firehol > onto the system, at which point the -doc package installs correctly.
I'm looking for package pair sharing a filename and then I look for an upgrade path (ususally a partial upgrade) using apt-get that respects all dependencies and results in a file overwrite error. So the package manager could actually choose a similar path in some corner case ... Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
