Anand Kumria wrote: > On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 04:34:28PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > >>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>Hash: SHA1 > > > Is there a reason to be doing inline PGP in this day and age?
No, not really, I'm just used to it :-) >>Hi >> >>Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if >>you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a >>patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work. > > > Hi Luk, Hi Anand > Thanks for taking the time to look at this, however, a *much* simpler > patch would be to update the Build-Dep line to 'automake1.8' as this is > what upstream is using. > > Then no regeneration is required at all. The patch is way smaller, though it's easy one way or the other ;-) > I already have a package ready to upload that addresses this and I'll > upload it later today (probably tomorrow from your perspective). Ok, thanks Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
