forcemerge 767079 767056 tags 767079 pending thanks On Tue, 28 Oct 2014, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> afsd is already running? Well, the intent is that that was helpful. I concede the overall result isn't terribly good. > I raised the severity because this leaves dpkg in an unhappy state, I > hope that’s ok. That seems appropriate for the nature of my packaging error. I'm merging this with the previous report of the same issue. The postinst is trying to run a helper script that assumes that the openafs-client is not running, but the setup for the package that I inherited keeps the client running through the upgrade. I need to modify the helper script to be more correct given the assumptions made by the environment in which it runs. Thanks for the report. -Ben
