On Lu, 27 oct 14, 19:07:24, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:48:53 +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > > > Control: severity -1 critical > > > > > Arguably this should even be considered RC and/or considered for a > > > stable update (assuming the fix is not too intrusive), because a lot of > > > bugs can get "lost", including important ones (RC, transition blockers, > > > etc.). > > > > Indeed, this destroys reportbug! > > Hm ... While I agreed that this bug is annoying, "critical" [0] seems > a tad over the top. If it were my call, I'd stay with the previously > used "important" severity.
Critical might be a tad too much, but definitely 'serious' (i.e. RC). Just as a data point, I get via unknown-package@ on average 1-2 bugs *per day* due to this bug. Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic http://nuvreauspam.ro/gpg-transition.txt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
