On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 07:31:34 -0500
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Juli=E1n_Moreno_Pati=F1o?= <jul...@debian.org> wrote:
> Control: severity -1 serious
>
> Hello,
>
> I don't think so, openrc built fine in those arches.
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=openrc&arch=armel
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=openrc&arch=armhf
>
>
> In the revision 0.12.4+20131230-8 built ok, something in the next revision
> 0.12.4+20131230-9 broke the build.
>
> Checking the git repository, there are a lot of changes.
>
> git diff debian/0.12.4+20131230-8 debian/0.12.4+20131230-9
>
> Also, checking the build logs, I saw the something similar in the failing
> arches:
>
> armel:
> * Missing hidden defs:$\nrc_deptree_remove_loopdependency.8686
> [ !! ]
>
> armhf:
> * Missing hidden defs:$\nrc_deptree_remove_loopdependency.8703
> [ !! ]
>
> ppc64el:
> * Missing hidden defs:$\nrc_deptree_remove_loopdependency.6877
> rc_deptree_unapm_getdependencies
> [ !! ]
>
I met the same situation on mips64el, 0.12.4+20131230-9 built
successfully, while
0.13.1-2 failed.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> --
> Juli�n Moreno Pati�o
> Debian Developer
> �.''`. Debian GNU/{Linux,KfreeBSD}
> : :' : Free Operating Systems
> `. `' �http://debian.org/
> ��`- � GPG Fingerprint:
> C2C8 904E 314C D8FA 041D 9B00 D5FD FC15 6168 BF60
> Registered GNU Linux User ID 488513
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
