On 2014-10-05 David Prévot <da...@tilapin.org> wrote: > Le 05/10/2014 08:37, Andreas Metzler a écrit :
>> gst-plugins-bad0.10 build-depends on libgnutls-dev which is >> - scheduled for removal >> - and (somehow related) uninstallable. >> >> The b-d therefore makes the package FTBFS. Please update it to >> libgnutls28-dev instead. > Why not rather have libgnutls-dev be provided by the “new” > libgnutls28-dev instead of the scheduled-for-removal gnutls26 source > package? Hello, GnuTLS 2 and 3 are not completely API compatible. And given that this transition is basically finished (except for openldap and about 10 packages which build-depend on libgnutls-dev without generating binaries that depend on libgnutls26), I would like to keep the small benefit of having this incompatibility reflected in the package name. cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
