On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 02:34:10AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 12:59:50PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > This should be remedied by src:libjpeg9 providing libjpeg-progs as > > requested > > by Bill Allombert, the libjpeg6b/8/9 maintainer. > > > > If you want to make this a tad bit clearer, you can report bug against > > libjpeg9 > > to provide libjpeg-progs and add block relation between that and this > > bug. > > Please reassign/retitle/clone as appropriate. > > I don't mind which source package creates the dummy package, as far as > there is a consensus that the dummy package should exist.
I need to clarify the libjpeg-progs built from the libjpeg8 source package is not a dummy package. Unfortunately it has been hijacked by the libjpeg-turbo package and replaced by a dummy (as I understand) package. But if you rebuild the libjpeg8 source package you still get the non-dummy libjpeg-progs package. If this is awkward to you, it is awkward to me too. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
