Hi, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 08:29:13PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > > Is mutter solely used for gnome-shell? Should it be linux-any and > > simply removed from kfreebsd? > > I'll just say that I won't stand in your way if you want the > packages removed on kfreebsd.
I'd prefer not to - but: * the top-level ./configure requires libgbm-dev * I don't think it's a gratituous dependency: src/backends/meta-cursor.c uses gbm throughout * gbm seems to be a component of mesa requiring udev, so we don't have it yet (although FreeBSD has some experimental port in progress: libdevq is mentioned on https://wiki.freebsd.org/Graphics) If mutter is the gnome-shell window manager, and we don't have gnome-shell, I don't suppose we have much need for it standalone. So if you don't disagree, I'll file a request to ftpmaster. > If you install "ubuntu-dev-tools" theres a utility there that will > make it easy for you to identify reverse dependencies. Thanks, this is useful. According to this, the only reverse-deps are linux-any packages: | $ reverse-depends src:mutter | Reverse-Recommends | ================== | * gnome-shell-dbg [amd64 armel armhf i386 mips mipsel powerpc ppc64el s390x sparc] (for mutter-dbg) | | Reverse-Depends | =============== | * gnome-core-devel (for libmutter-dev) | * gnome-shell [mips mipsel sparc] (for libmutter0d) | * gnome-shell [amd64 armel armhf i386 mips mipsel powerpc ppc64el s390x sparc] (for gir1.2-mutter-3.0) | * gnome-shell [amd64 armel armhf i386 powerpc ppc64el s390x] (for libmutter0e) | | Packages without architectures listed are reverse-dependencies in: amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x, sparc (And I got the same impression from manually grepping the kfreebsd-amd64 Packages file). Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
