tags 762404 + patch thanks Hi,
> Encountered regressions that don't match expected failures > (debian/testsuite-checking/expected-results-x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu-libc): > tst-execstack-needed.out, Error 1 > tst-execstack.out, Error 1 > tst-execstack-prog.out, Error 1 I decided to simply add those to the list of expected failures, since: > Similar to SElinux enforcement of allow_execstack=0 - something the > test program checks for and knows how to handle [...] I suggest the test > could be fixed for any version of kfreebsd by checking the appropriate > sysctl. In short, I tried to implement this, but kfreebsd's stack protector seems to trigger a SIGSEGV in the process rather than whatever SElinux does. It also wouldn't fix the tst-execstack-needed and -prog tests. Patch attached! Thanks, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org
--- debian/testsuite-checking/expected-results-i586-kfreebsd-gnu-libc.orig 2014-09-12 21:50:56.000000000 +0000 +++ debian/testsuite-checking/expected-results-i586-kfreebsd-gnu-libc 2014-09-27 00:54:07.869807173 +0000 @@ -20,6 +20,11 @@ tst-timer4.out, Error 1 tst-timer5.out, Error 1 tst-waitid.out, Error 1 +# will expectedly SIGSEGV on kfreebsd 10.0 and later, due to having +# nxstack=1 by default (bug #762404) +tst-execstack-needed.out, Error 1 +tst-execstack.out, Error 1 +tst-execstack-prog.out, Error 1 # # needs newer kernel - see #716746 # --- debian/testsuite-checking/expected-results-x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu-libc.orig 2014-09-12 21:50:56.000000000 +0000 +++ debian/testsuite-checking/expected-results-x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu-libc 2014-09-27 00:40:54.945854744 +0000 @@ -22,6 +22,13 @@ tst-waitid.out, Error 1 tst-writev.out, Error 1 # +# will expectedly SIGSEGV on kfreebsd 10.0 and later, due to having +# nxstack=1 by default (bug #762404) +# +tst-execstack-needed.out, Error 1 +tst-execstack.out, Error 1 +tst-execstack-prog.out, Error 1 +# # needs newer kernel - see #716746 # tst-cpuclock1.out, Error 1
