Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 23:00:25 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ocamlodbc: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to
`caml_Double_val'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 03:25:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 19:25:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from blars.org ([64.81.35.59] helo=renig.nat.blars.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Eq02c-00027T-Tp
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:25:55 -0800
Received: from quaff (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id
jBO3Pq57006406
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:25:52 -0800
Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1])
by quaff (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jBO3UbTF011716;
Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:30:38 -0800
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jBO3Ubul011714;
Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:30:37 -0800
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:30:37 -0800
From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ocamlodbc: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `caml_Double_val'
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.18
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: ocamlodbc
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
ocamlodbc failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
pbuilder. This seems to be the same error as 344463, so is probably
in a dependant package.
Some other architectures are still failing to build due to what looks like
bug 340103, which should probably be reopened.
+ grep -v DEBUG 'biniki.ml' > /tmp/camlpp3893ba
make[2]: gtk-config: Command not found
/usr/bin/ocamlc -verbose -custom -o biniki -ccopt -fPIC -ccopt -L../unixodbc -I
../unixodbc -ccopt " -L/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2 -llablgtk2 "
ocamlodbc.cma unix.cma str.cma /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/lablgtk.cma
/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/gtkInit.cmo biniki_messages.cmo biniki_misc.cmo
biniki_context.cmo biniki_query_box.cmo biniki_window.cmo biniki.cmo
+ gcc -Wl,-E -o 'biniki' -I'/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0' -fPIC -L../unixodbc
-L/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2 -llablgtk2 -lodbc -lodbc
/tmp/camlprimd42d28.c '-L../unixodbc' '-L/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0' '-llablgtk2'
'-lgtk-x11-2.0' '-lgdk-x11-2.0' '-latk-1.0' '-lgdk_pixbuf-2.0' '-lm'
'-lpangoxft-1.0' '-lpangox-1.0' '-lpangoft2-1.0' '-lpango-1.0' '-lgobject-2.0'
'-lgmodule-2.0' '-ldl' '-lglib-2.0' '-lstr' '-lunix' '-locamlodbc' -lcamlrun
-lm -ldl -lcurses -lpthread
/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtktree.o): In function
`ml_gtk_tree_view_scroll_to_cell': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val'
/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtktree.o): In function
`ml_gtk_tree_view_scroll_to_cell': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val'
/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtklist.o): In function
`ml_gtk_clist_moveto': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val'
/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtklist.o): In function
`ml_gtk_clist_moveto': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val'
/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtkedit.o): In function
`ml_gtk_spin_button_spin': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val'
/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtk.o): more undefined
references to `caml_Double_val' follow
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Error while building custom runtime system
make[2]: *** [biniki] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ocamlodbc-2.10/Biniki'
make[1]: *** [unixodbc] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ocamlodbc-2.10/Biniki'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 344688-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Dec 2005 07:00:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 24 23:00:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86]
helo=tennyson.dodds.net)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EqPrm-0007cx-Gx
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 23:00:26 -0800
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0B2E07009; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 23:00:25 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 23:00:25 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ocamlodbc: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `caml_Double_val'
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XRI2XbIfl/05pQwm"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--XRI2XbIfl/05pQwm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Then I tried to rebuild lablgl which went on fine and then I could=20
> compile cleanly lablgtk2 and ocamlodbc.
> So, I'll go for binNMUs soon (only sparc seems to be affected) unless=20
> someone objects to it.
A binNMU has been queued for lablgl on sparc to fix this bug.
Cheers,
--=20
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--XRI2XbIfl/05pQwm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDrkOJKN6ufymYLloRAv+uAJ9B5zuoXCrxe99/ClyWXuEYIvaX7ACfVOrQ
OKysbaMnixo8M9lP5kvdU+U=
=4Ooi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--XRI2XbIfl/05pQwm--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
