Hi Alexis, Alexis Sukrieh schrieb: > * Christoph Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait : > >>If I understand this correct the packages has only to be rebuild and no >>changes have to be make in the sources. What do you want to change in >>the sources for the NMU? > > Well, I thought the source should have been sync with the binary. Forget > my mail if that's useless. I was also thinking that a changelog entry > would have been cleaner than a binary-only NMU.
Yes it would be nice to have the two in sync. However there is a
changelog entry in the binary package for the binary NMU.
> But I must be wrong, sorry for the noise.
No. Thanks for your work. If you think a real NMU would make the case
clearer and speed up the inclusion in testing, go ahead. The maintainer
of cl-tclink is really not responsive.
Cheers
Christoph
--
============================================================================
Christoph Martin, Leiter der EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany
Internet-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telefon: +49-6131-3926337
Fax: +49-6131-3922856
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
