Your message dated Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:07:08 +0200
with message-id <20140822100708.gc29...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: [pkg-cryptsetup-devel] Bug#758755: Bug#758756:
libgcrypt20: missing udeb: libgcrypt20-udeb
has caused the Debian Bug report #758755,
regarding libcryptsetup4-udeb: depends on libgcrypt20-udeb, which doesn't exist
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
758755: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=758755
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libcryptsetup4-udeb
Version: 2:1.6.6-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
your package is no longer installable, because it now depends on
libgcrypt20-udeb, which is nowhere to be found.
This means at least these packages are uninstallable:
partman-crypto-dm
rescue-mode
which both depend on:
cryptsetup-udeb
which depends on:
libcryptsetup4-udeb
Likely a bug in libgcrypt20 (which builds no udeb but leads you to get a
dependency on it) which I'm about to file. I don't see it in the archive
or in NEW at least.
The switch to libgcrypt20 seems premature to me.
[Please keep debian-boot@ (x-d-cc'd) in the loop when replying.]
Mraw,
KiBi.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Jonas Meurer <jo...@freesources.org> (2014-08-22):
> Thanks for your help Cyril. Does this mean, that you're ok with
> cryptsetup keeping libgcrypt20 dependency now that the corresponding
> udeb will be in Debian soon?
It's already in. ;)
https://packages.qa.debian.org/libg/libgcrypt20/news/20140821T210007Z.html
I was just waiting confirmation and indeed last run has:
| Newly-fixed packages in unstable
| cryptsetup-udeb amd64 armel armhf i386 mipsel
powerpc s390x sparc
| libcryptsetup4-udeb amd64 armel armhf i386 mipsel
powerpc s390x sparc
| partman-crypto-dm amd64 armel armhf i386 mipsel
powerpc s390x sparc
| rescue-mode amd64 i386 mipsel powerpc sparc
|
| Uninstallability trend: better (+0/-29)
| Uninstallability count: 494
→ Closing this bug report accordingly. :)
> Sorry that I didn't coordinate with debian-boot. I simply didn't think
> about the consequences enough. I guess that's due to me not being
> involved in library transitions too often :-/ *sorry*
Don't worry, that's fine. That was caught by the (un)installability
checker, fixed in a few days; nothing to worry about. udebs are a bit
special and it's not as easy to make sure everything is fine as it is
for regular packages.
I haven't checked cryptsetup works fine yet, though. But that's another
story. :)
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
