Hi, On 08/18/2014 11:38, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Ansgar Burchardt 2014-08-18 <53f1c2b7.9070...@debian.org> >> Thats another problem. Regenerating d/control (and actually changing it) >> is a RC bug on its own. I guess pg-reorg is not the only package doing >> that, but didn't look into it. > > That only happens in coordination with postgresql-common. The > coordination is tracked there: > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/postgresql-9.4.html > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=migration-94;tag=migration-93;users=pkg-postgresql-pub...@lists.alioth.debian.org > https://wiki.debian.org/pkg-postgresql/migration94
So it's a case of should never break in theory, but does in practice? :) Please don't silently regenerate d/control. It could generate a new one and *fail* the build if it differs; the maintainer should use a special target in d/rules or "mv d/control.new d/control" and restart the build. See also "debian/control breakage #2" in the REJECT-FAQ[1]. [1] <https://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html> Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
