tags 344046 +wontfix
thanks
Hi,
This is still a bug in GCC.
> By this standard, almost all toolchain bugs would be
> release-critical bugs. This is not reasonable;
I beg to differ. We should not be shipping GCC where -O2 does
not work for common constructs.
And it is not as if make is using obscure gcc invocation
options: -O2 has been the norm for decades. Having -O2 fail is a
regression in GCC; and making people use worse optimazations or
special case architectures to work around breakage is other packages
is also not acceptable.
This is not going to be fixed in make, and patches to add
complex arch specific code into the build system shall be rejected.
manoj
--
And now for something completely different.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
