Control: reopen -1 > I'm not sure if this is sufficient to ensure a certain unpack ordering > in all corner cases. Using > Breaks+Replaces: libc-bin (<< 2.16) > would get you on the safe side.
Correct. Adding a versioned dependency on libc-bin is not the correct solution here. It may make this bug somewhat less likely to be triggered, but Depends: does not guarantee anything about unpack order, and rpcbind otherwise has no reason to depend on libc-bin. Aníbal, please use versioned Breaks/Replaces against libc-bin, which is the correct package relationship here. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
